South Core Secondary Municipal Plan

Share South Core Secondary Municipal Plan on Facebook Share South Core Secondary Municipal Plan on Twitter Share South Core Secondary Municipal Plan on Linkedin Email South Core Secondary Municipal Plan link

The City of Fredericton is growing! With that growth comes both opportunities and challenges in neighbourhoods across our city. This includes the Urban Core, made up of three distinct areas: the City Centre, Main Street (North side), and the South Core. Secondary Municipal Plans for the City Centre and Main Street were completed in 2015 and 2016, but the current plan guiding a majority of the South Core (see Map above) titled the Residential Town Plat Area Plan was adopted over twenty years ago. While this plan has successfully balanced new development with the strong sense of community and residential character, a lot has changed.

A new Growth Strategy and Municipal Plan envision a more urban, compact, and sustainable Fredericton. Significant residential and employment growth is projected to be accommodated throughout the Urban Core and the South Core plays a key role in achieving the goals outlined in both important documents. The City's 2017 Growth Strategy and 2020 Imagine Fredericton: Municipal Plan are the guiding documents that help dictate how the city develops as a whole, and envisions an urban, compact, and sustainable Fredericton. Significant residential and employment growth must be accommodated throughout the Urban Core and the South Core plays a key role in achieving the important goals of these plans.

The current South Core Secondary Municipal Plan process will re-examine how we grow while maintaining the neighbourhood’s community character. This Plan will provide a framework to guide the ongoing evolution of the area. Our team has been exploring the conditions, features and attributes that make up the South Core, developing ideas for street design, land use, public space, new buildings, and preparing design guidelines and policies to provide direction for change.


Thank you to everyone who has participated in our South Core planning process. We have concluded our public engagement activities and are preparing to enter the adoption process later this summer. This will include a public hearing at the Planning Advisory Committee and City Council where the final documents will be presented.

For those wishing to learn more about the project, please browse the information in our Documents section to review everything that has been shared to date. If you have any questions or comments, please submit them to the Questions tab below.


The City of Fredericton is growing! With that growth comes both opportunities and challenges in neighbourhoods across our city. This includes the Urban Core, made up of three distinct areas: the City Centre, Main Street (North side), and the South Core. Secondary Municipal Plans for the City Centre and Main Street were completed in 2015 and 2016, but the current plan guiding a majority of the South Core (see Map above) titled the Residential Town Plat Area Plan was adopted over twenty years ago. While this plan has successfully balanced new development with the strong sense of community and residential character, a lot has changed.

A new Growth Strategy and Municipal Plan envision a more urban, compact, and sustainable Fredericton. Significant residential and employment growth is projected to be accommodated throughout the Urban Core and the South Core plays a key role in achieving the goals outlined in both important documents. The City's 2017 Growth Strategy and 2020 Imagine Fredericton: Municipal Plan are the guiding documents that help dictate how the city develops as a whole, and envisions an urban, compact, and sustainable Fredericton. Significant residential and employment growth must be accommodated throughout the Urban Core and the South Core plays a key role in achieving the important goals of these plans.

The current South Core Secondary Municipal Plan process will re-examine how we grow while maintaining the neighbourhood’s community character. This Plan will provide a framework to guide the ongoing evolution of the area. Our team has been exploring the conditions, features and attributes that make up the South Core, developing ideas for street design, land use, public space, new buildings, and preparing design guidelines and policies to provide direction for change.


Thank you to everyone who has participated in our South Core planning process. We have concluded our public engagement activities and are preparing to enter the adoption process later this summer. This will include a public hearing at the Planning Advisory Committee and City Council where the final documents will be presented.

For those wishing to learn more about the project, please browse the information in our Documents section to review everything that has been shared to date. If you have any questions or comments, please submit them to the Questions tab below.


Let us know what questions you have!

In order to best facilitate the upcoming sessions, the City of Fredericton is seeking preliminary questions about the South Core Secondary Municipal Plan from residents. 

loader image
Forgot password?
Didn't receive confirmation?
Register Now
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share Hello! I just saw the final plan in the upcoming PAC. I apparently didn't hear about the engagement opportunities.. for that I'm sad and sorry, as I had a concern that it appears I really should've called to attention. I'll put it here regardless in hopes that it still helps. Specifically, while the city is doing great in considering intracity transport options, I'm concerned that the city isn't considering how people will move *between* our city and others in the future, in its municipal plans. While this plan wouldn't touch on intercity bus terminal locations or the like, it does have major implications for the feasibility of passenger train connections for our city due to it encompassing several old ROWs converted to railtrails. Looking at this plan, the draft sketches show the old rail ROW impeded on in multiple locations on the way to the old station and to multiple alternative station sites that would make it unusable for railway uses without either some major headaches, or a station site much further on the outskirts of the city.. which is a shame considering the ROW is intact nearly right into the core, where a station would be ideal and world-class quality! I understand that intercity rail travel for Fredericton is a pipe dream currently, due to lack of viability and present political will, but I'm worried that not even making sure to leave the door open with an intact, linear retained ROW will mean it's firmly locked away should the political will intensify, which seems likely it will given the priorities of the last few decades in making our way of life greener, as the city is doing as well. So, will the city be keeping a mind to this in the future? I would hope so and would love to discuss more or hear more details as this is something I care much about. Thank you, A resident on Facebook Share Hello! I just saw the final plan in the upcoming PAC. I apparently didn't hear about the engagement opportunities.. for that I'm sad and sorry, as I had a concern that it appears I really should've called to attention. I'll put it here regardless in hopes that it still helps. Specifically, while the city is doing great in considering intracity transport options, I'm concerned that the city isn't considering how people will move *between* our city and others in the future, in its municipal plans. While this plan wouldn't touch on intercity bus terminal locations or the like, it does have major implications for the feasibility of passenger train connections for our city due to it encompassing several old ROWs converted to railtrails. Looking at this plan, the draft sketches show the old rail ROW impeded on in multiple locations on the way to the old station and to multiple alternative station sites that would make it unusable for railway uses without either some major headaches, or a station site much further on the outskirts of the city.. which is a shame considering the ROW is intact nearly right into the core, where a station would be ideal and world-class quality! I understand that intercity rail travel for Fredericton is a pipe dream currently, due to lack of viability and present political will, but I'm worried that not even making sure to leave the door open with an intact, linear retained ROW will mean it's firmly locked away should the political will intensify, which seems likely it will given the priorities of the last few decades in making our way of life greener, as the city is doing as well. So, will the city be keeping a mind to this in the future? I would hope so and would love to discuss more or hear more details as this is something I care much about. Thank you, A resident on Twitter Share Hello! I just saw the final plan in the upcoming PAC. I apparently didn't hear about the engagement opportunities.. for that I'm sad and sorry, as I had a concern that it appears I really should've called to attention. I'll put it here regardless in hopes that it still helps. Specifically, while the city is doing great in considering intracity transport options, I'm concerned that the city isn't considering how people will move *between* our city and others in the future, in its municipal plans. While this plan wouldn't touch on intercity bus terminal locations or the like, it does have major implications for the feasibility of passenger train connections for our city due to it encompassing several old ROWs converted to railtrails. Looking at this plan, the draft sketches show the old rail ROW impeded on in multiple locations on the way to the old station and to multiple alternative station sites that would make it unusable for railway uses without either some major headaches, or a station site much further on the outskirts of the city.. which is a shame considering the ROW is intact nearly right into the core, where a station would be ideal and world-class quality! I understand that intercity rail travel for Fredericton is a pipe dream currently, due to lack of viability and present political will, but I'm worried that not even making sure to leave the door open with an intact, linear retained ROW will mean it's firmly locked away should the political will intensify, which seems likely it will given the priorities of the last few decades in making our way of life greener, as the city is doing as well. So, will the city be keeping a mind to this in the future? I would hope so and would love to discuss more or hear more details as this is something I care much about. Thank you, A resident on Linkedin Email Hello! I just saw the final plan in the upcoming PAC. I apparently didn't hear about the engagement opportunities.. for that I'm sad and sorry, as I had a concern that it appears I really should've called to attention. I'll put it here regardless in hopes that it still helps. Specifically, while the city is doing great in considering intracity transport options, I'm concerned that the city isn't considering how people will move *between* our city and others in the future, in its municipal plans. While this plan wouldn't touch on intercity bus terminal locations or the like, it does have major implications for the feasibility of passenger train connections for our city due to it encompassing several old ROWs converted to railtrails. Looking at this plan, the draft sketches show the old rail ROW impeded on in multiple locations on the way to the old station and to multiple alternative station sites that would make it unusable for railway uses without either some major headaches, or a station site much further on the outskirts of the city.. which is a shame considering the ROW is intact nearly right into the core, where a station would be ideal and world-class quality! I understand that intercity rail travel for Fredericton is a pipe dream currently, due to lack of viability and present political will, but I'm worried that not even making sure to leave the door open with an intact, linear retained ROW will mean it's firmly locked away should the political will intensify, which seems likely it will given the priorities of the last few decades in making our way of life greener, as the city is doing as well. So, will the city be keeping a mind to this in the future? I would hope so and would love to discuss more or hear more details as this is something I care much about. Thank you, A resident link

    Hello! I just saw the final plan in the upcoming PAC. I apparently didn't hear about the engagement opportunities.. for that I'm sad and sorry, as I had a concern that it appears I really should've called to attention. I'll put it here regardless in hopes that it still helps. Specifically, while the city is doing great in considering intracity transport options, I'm concerned that the city isn't considering how people will move *between* our city and others in the future, in its municipal plans. While this plan wouldn't touch on intercity bus terminal locations or the like, it does have major implications for the feasibility of passenger train connections for our city due to it encompassing several old ROWs converted to railtrails. Looking at this plan, the draft sketches show the old rail ROW impeded on in multiple locations on the way to the old station and to multiple alternative station sites that would make it unusable for railway uses without either some major headaches, or a station site much further on the outskirts of the city.. which is a shame considering the ROW is intact nearly right into the core, where a station would be ideal and world-class quality! I understand that intercity rail travel for Fredericton is a pipe dream currently, due to lack of viability and present political will, but I'm worried that not even making sure to leave the door open with an intact, linear retained ROW will mean it's firmly locked away should the political will intensify, which seems likely it will given the priorities of the last few decades in making our way of life greener, as the city is doing as well. So, will the city be keeping a mind to this in the future? I would hope so and would love to discuss more or hear more details as this is something I care much about. Thank you, A resident

    Ian Murdoch asked about 1 month ago

    Thank you for your comments and question. The technical background report for the South Core Plan acknowledges the former railway and industrial district in the southern section of the South that emerged during the late 19th century. Today, the trail network looks to follow the former railway lines and see redevelopment on the former railway yards. As the City continues to experience unprecedented population growth, the South Core Plan looks to update the vision for the neighbourhood and establish the future land use that would accommodate approximately 6,000 new residents. As you will see in the South Core Plan, there are several policies and proposal that speak to the importance of trails and an overall connected trail network. Notably the Cross Town Trail which runs through the South Core, provides an important amenity and active transportation route. More information on the South Core Plan is available on our engage page: https://engagefredericton.ca/south-core-secondary-municipal-plan as well as more information on the Cross Town Trail: https://engagefredericton.ca/crosstowntrail. 

    With rail transportation being a federal/provincial responsibility, depending on its scope, implementing rail would go far beyond the municipality and the South Core Plan and would require significant investment from multiple levels of government. Section 3.9 of the City’s Municipal Plan does speak to mobility and transportation and includes policies that support a full range of transportation modes to help achieve the City’s goals of promoting energy efficiency. The Municipal Plan encourages transportation investments that reduce emissions and encourages the province to consider the City’s growth management goals in the planning of provincial transportation facilities. Overall, both the South Core Plan and Municipal Plan support the development of a multi-modal transportation system that better addresses the urban context of the city. 

  • Share Three handouts were provided at the April 2 meeting. Will these be provided in electronic format here, or somewhere online? Also, could you share how best to provide feedback on the plan during the month long feedback period and when that closes? Thanks and great session! on Facebook Share Three handouts were provided at the April 2 meeting. Will these be provided in electronic format here, or somewhere online? Also, could you share how best to provide feedback on the plan during the month long feedback period and when that closes? Thanks and great session! on Twitter Share Three handouts were provided at the April 2 meeting. Will these be provided in electronic format here, or somewhere online? Also, could you share how best to provide feedback on the plan during the month long feedback period and when that closes? Thanks and great session! on Linkedin Email Three handouts were provided at the April 2 meeting. Will these be provided in electronic format here, or somewhere online? Also, could you share how best to provide feedback on the plan during the month long feedback period and when that closes? Thanks and great session! link

    Three handouts were provided at the April 2 meeting. Will these be provided in electronic format here, or somewhere online? Also, could you share how best to provide feedback on the plan during the month long feedback period and when that closes? Thanks and great session!

    jthompson asked 6 months ago

    Hi! Thanks so much for your comment. The documents are now available on the right of the project page. 

    The best way to provide feedback is to submit comments through the engage page, to our email at southcore@planpart.ca, or drop off written comments to City Hall. 

    Thanks for coming out last night, we look forward to hearing your feedback!

  • Share Overall I appreciate what I've seen in the plan and am looking forward to seeing a draft. I have a couple of specific questions. First, the plan calls for designating certain corridors for intensification. How will you achieve a transition from the current low-density, low-rise residential streetscape to the anticipated future situation where those corridors are primarily 5-7 storey buildings? Normally, the by-law requires a gradual height transition between multi-residential and adjacent low-rise zones, and, ideally, there’s consideration of overlooking and light planes. But if you simply rezone e.g. all of Smythe St from TP-2/3/4/etc to MR-5, within the street there are no adjacent low-rise zones, so property owners would have the right to build a 7-story apartment building beside a small house. Secondly, how will the green principles and sponge zones be implemented and enforced, given that the sponge zones are mostly in private yards? In some of the slides from the last design studio presentation, there seem to be apartment buildings and garden suites built over some sponge zones, which I believe the anticipated zoning would allow that as of right. More fundamentally, I’m not personally aware of anything that currently stops anyone from paving their entire property if they feel like it (there are a few in town like that). on Facebook Share Overall I appreciate what I've seen in the plan and am looking forward to seeing a draft. I have a couple of specific questions. First, the plan calls for designating certain corridors for intensification. How will you achieve a transition from the current low-density, low-rise residential streetscape to the anticipated future situation where those corridors are primarily 5-7 storey buildings? Normally, the by-law requires a gradual height transition between multi-residential and adjacent low-rise zones, and, ideally, there’s consideration of overlooking and light planes. But if you simply rezone e.g. all of Smythe St from TP-2/3/4/etc to MR-5, within the street there are no adjacent low-rise zones, so property owners would have the right to build a 7-story apartment building beside a small house. Secondly, how will the green principles and sponge zones be implemented and enforced, given that the sponge zones are mostly in private yards? In some of the slides from the last design studio presentation, there seem to be apartment buildings and garden suites built over some sponge zones, which I believe the anticipated zoning would allow that as of right. More fundamentally, I’m not personally aware of anything that currently stops anyone from paving their entire property if they feel like it (there are a few in town like that). on Twitter Share Overall I appreciate what I've seen in the plan and am looking forward to seeing a draft. I have a couple of specific questions. First, the plan calls for designating certain corridors for intensification. How will you achieve a transition from the current low-density, low-rise residential streetscape to the anticipated future situation where those corridors are primarily 5-7 storey buildings? Normally, the by-law requires a gradual height transition between multi-residential and adjacent low-rise zones, and, ideally, there’s consideration of overlooking and light planes. But if you simply rezone e.g. all of Smythe St from TP-2/3/4/etc to MR-5, within the street there are no adjacent low-rise zones, so property owners would have the right to build a 7-story apartment building beside a small house. Secondly, how will the green principles and sponge zones be implemented and enforced, given that the sponge zones are mostly in private yards? In some of the slides from the last design studio presentation, there seem to be apartment buildings and garden suites built over some sponge zones, which I believe the anticipated zoning would allow that as of right. More fundamentally, I’m not personally aware of anything that currently stops anyone from paving their entire property if they feel like it (there are a few in town like that). on Linkedin Email Overall I appreciate what I've seen in the plan and am looking forward to seeing a draft. I have a couple of specific questions. First, the plan calls for designating certain corridors for intensification. How will you achieve a transition from the current low-density, low-rise residential streetscape to the anticipated future situation where those corridors are primarily 5-7 storey buildings? Normally, the by-law requires a gradual height transition between multi-residential and adjacent low-rise zones, and, ideally, there’s consideration of overlooking and light planes. But if you simply rezone e.g. all of Smythe St from TP-2/3/4/etc to MR-5, within the street there are no adjacent low-rise zones, so property owners would have the right to build a 7-story apartment building beside a small house. Secondly, how will the green principles and sponge zones be implemented and enforced, given that the sponge zones are mostly in private yards? In some of the slides from the last design studio presentation, there seem to be apartment buildings and garden suites built over some sponge zones, which I believe the anticipated zoning would allow that as of right. More fundamentally, I’m not personally aware of anything that currently stops anyone from paving their entire property if they feel like it (there are a few in town like that). link

    Overall I appreciate what I've seen in the plan and am looking forward to seeing a draft. I have a couple of specific questions. First, the plan calls for designating certain corridors for intensification. How will you achieve a transition from the current low-density, low-rise residential streetscape to the anticipated future situation where those corridors are primarily 5-7 storey buildings? Normally, the by-law requires a gradual height transition between multi-residential and adjacent low-rise zones, and, ideally, there’s consideration of overlooking and light planes. But if you simply rezone e.g. all of Smythe St from TP-2/3/4/etc to MR-5, within the street there are no adjacent low-rise zones, so property owners would have the right to build a 7-story apartment building beside a small house. Secondly, how will the green principles and sponge zones be implemented and enforced, given that the sponge zones are mostly in private yards? In some of the slides from the last design studio presentation, there seem to be apartment buildings and garden suites built over some sponge zones, which I believe the anticipated zoning would allow that as of right. More fundamentally, I’m not personally aware of anything that currently stops anyone from paving their entire property if they feel like it (there are a few in town like that).

    Kelly Murray asked 6 months ago

    Thank you for reaching out Kelly! We intend to answer most of your questions during the presentation at our Open House tomorrow night (6pm at the Charlotte Street Arts Centre), if you’re able to attend. However, here is a a brief explanation for your questions:

    Corridor Transitions

    We have a section in our Urban Design Guidelines specifically addressing the transition of mid and high-rise buildings adjacent to the low-rise residential areas. Policies for screening and buffers to help maintain privacy are also included and the Zoning By-law will further reinforce the transition and screening. At this time, there are no considerations being made to rezone these properties along with the adoption of this Plan. Typically, a development application will be made by an owner that wishes to rezone and the City will ensure it meets the policies of the Plan. In some cases, the existing zoning will be sufficient, but there may be other application requirements such as a variance. 

    Sponge Area

    You’re correct that this is primarily within private yards. We would ensure that any development proposals are providing sufficient landscape area in their rear yard as a requirement to a development approval. Furthermore, anyone submitting permits for work in the South Core will need to maintain or enhance this rear yard ‘sponge area’. This will be updated in the Zoning By-law to provide specific thresholds that must be met. We recognize that there will need to be some amount of landscape removal for development, but the Design Guidelines will outline how this area can be maintained or enhanced. 

    Thanks again for reaching out! The document package will be online tomorrow for review, and there will be a month-long period to submit any comments, questions or concerns you may have.


  • Share Will there be a harness track located somewhere in Fred area? on Facebook Share Will there be a harness track located somewhere in Fred area? on Twitter Share Will there be a harness track located somewhere in Fred area? on Linkedin Email Will there be a harness track located somewhere in Fred area? link

    Will there be a harness track located somewhere in Fred area?

    Jeff Macleod asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question! The location of a new harness track within the Fredericton Area is dependent upon the interests of NBEX. The City is open to working with the future track operators on a new location if/when it is identified.

  • Share Driving in the Downtown Core has always come with unique challenges with high traffic, pedestrians, and cyclists on the road. Many people become increasingly impatient attempting left hand turns when there is not a designated left turn signal. Having to navigate the road traffic plus watching for pedestrians causes traffic delays and sometimes near miss accidents. Is there a plan in place to have all intersections in the downtown core have left turning signal lights to ease this concern? on Facebook Share Driving in the Downtown Core has always come with unique challenges with high traffic, pedestrians, and cyclists on the road. Many people become increasingly impatient attempting left hand turns when there is not a designated left turn signal. Having to navigate the road traffic plus watching for pedestrians causes traffic delays and sometimes near miss accidents. Is there a plan in place to have all intersections in the downtown core have left turning signal lights to ease this concern? on Twitter Share Driving in the Downtown Core has always come with unique challenges with high traffic, pedestrians, and cyclists on the road. Many people become increasingly impatient attempting left hand turns when there is not a designated left turn signal. Having to navigate the road traffic plus watching for pedestrians causes traffic delays and sometimes near miss accidents. Is there a plan in place to have all intersections in the downtown core have left turning signal lights to ease this concern? on Linkedin Email Driving in the Downtown Core has always come with unique challenges with high traffic, pedestrians, and cyclists on the road. Many people become increasingly impatient attempting left hand turns when there is not a designated left turn signal. Having to navigate the road traffic plus watching for pedestrians causes traffic delays and sometimes near miss accidents. Is there a plan in place to have all intersections in the downtown core have left turning signal lights to ease this concern? link

    Driving in the Downtown Core has always come with unique challenges with high traffic, pedestrians, and cyclists on the road. Many people become increasingly impatient attempting left hand turns when there is not a designated left turn signal. Having to navigate the road traffic plus watching for pedestrians causes traffic delays and sometimes near miss accidents. Is there a plan in place to have all intersections in the downtown core have left turning signal lights to ease this concern?

    Sarah Bernard asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question! Left turn signals certainly can have a positive impact a safety and congestion and we try to implement these whenever an intersection warrants them. The biggest challenge in areas like the Downtown or South Core is the availability of road width to work with, since there needs to be enough space for vehicles to wait and not block traffic. Whenever we plan for road work, such as on Regent Avenue currently, we look for ways to improve these designs for a safer experience. Through the South Core Plan process, as well as other active projects such as the Fredericton Transportation Study, we’ve been examining key intersections and will be exploring policies for future road work in the area that will create a safe environment for all users (vehicles, cyclists, pedestrians).

  • Share I just completed the survey, but I have a few questions. First of all: I hope that this survey does not open the door to "as-of-right development". Every project should still go through City Council, so that residents can be notified and have a say. I did not include more housing in my top three priorities, although I think this is important. It is important to me that new housing is added sensitively: character of neighbourhoods, green spaces, reduced speed zones. I was pleased with the options given in the survey for types, location of more housing. However, if developers are going to be invited to build more housing, there needs to be truly affordable housing that people with lower incomes could afford: the CMHC standard (30% of income) should be used not the "10% less than average standard currently used here". MOst important: We need an open and transparent process. on Facebook Share I just completed the survey, but I have a few questions. First of all: I hope that this survey does not open the door to "as-of-right development". Every project should still go through City Council, so that residents can be notified and have a say. I did not include more housing in my top three priorities, although I think this is important. It is important to me that new housing is added sensitively: character of neighbourhoods, green spaces, reduced speed zones. I was pleased with the options given in the survey for types, location of more housing. However, if developers are going to be invited to build more housing, there needs to be truly affordable housing that people with lower incomes could afford: the CMHC standard (30% of income) should be used not the "10% less than average standard currently used here". MOst important: We need an open and transparent process. on Twitter Share I just completed the survey, but I have a few questions. First of all: I hope that this survey does not open the door to "as-of-right development". Every project should still go through City Council, so that residents can be notified and have a say. I did not include more housing in my top three priorities, although I think this is important. It is important to me that new housing is added sensitively: character of neighbourhoods, green spaces, reduced speed zones. I was pleased with the options given in the survey for types, location of more housing. However, if developers are going to be invited to build more housing, there needs to be truly affordable housing that people with lower incomes could afford: the CMHC standard (30% of income) should be used not the "10% less than average standard currently used here". MOst important: We need an open and transparent process. on Linkedin Email I just completed the survey, but I have a few questions. First of all: I hope that this survey does not open the door to "as-of-right development". Every project should still go through City Council, so that residents can be notified and have a say. I did not include more housing in my top three priorities, although I think this is important. It is important to me that new housing is added sensitively: character of neighbourhoods, green spaces, reduced speed zones. I was pleased with the options given in the survey for types, location of more housing. However, if developers are going to be invited to build more housing, there needs to be truly affordable housing that people with lower incomes could afford: the CMHC standard (30% of income) should be used not the "10% less than average standard currently used here". MOst important: We need an open and transparent process. link

    I just completed the survey, but I have a few questions. First of all: I hope that this survey does not open the door to "as-of-right development". Every project should still go through City Council, so that residents can be notified and have a say. I did not include more housing in my top three priorities, although I think this is important. It is important to me that new housing is added sensitively: character of neighbourhoods, green spaces, reduced speed zones. I was pleased with the options given in the survey for types, location of more housing. However, if developers are going to be invited to build more housing, there needs to be truly affordable housing that people with lower incomes could afford: the CMHC standard (30% of income) should be used not the "10% less than average standard currently used here". MOst important: We need an open and transparent process.

    Caroline Lubbe-D’Arcy asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your comments and for taking the time to complete the South Core Plan survey. We have passed these comments along to our planning team for their consideration. We hope for your continued participation in this process as it moves forward.

  • Share Can I see the coloured map that you had at the market last weekend on Facebook Share Can I see the coloured map that you had at the market last weekend on Twitter Share Can I see the coloured map that you had at the market last weekend on Linkedin Email Can I see the coloured map that you had at the market last weekend link

    Can I see the coloured map that you had at the market last weekend

    Peterjohn asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for reaching out! We added the map to the webpage, you can find it via this link: https://engagefredericton.ca/42906/widgets/189286/documents/137534 

  • Share Since infill seems to be a big portion of this plan, I'm curious to know if the city is looking at any plans to lower regulations that could increase costs for developers. I am thinking of costly examples that have hindered developers from capitalizing on zoning reforms, such as parking minimums, unrealistic size limitations of buildings, and developer fees. on Facebook Share Since infill seems to be a big portion of this plan, I'm curious to know if the city is looking at any plans to lower regulations that could increase costs for developers. I am thinking of costly examples that have hindered developers from capitalizing on zoning reforms, such as parking minimums, unrealistic size limitations of buildings, and developer fees. on Twitter Share Since infill seems to be a big portion of this plan, I'm curious to know if the city is looking at any plans to lower regulations that could increase costs for developers. I am thinking of costly examples that have hindered developers from capitalizing on zoning reforms, such as parking minimums, unrealistic size limitations of buildings, and developer fees. on Linkedin Email Since infill seems to be a big portion of this plan, I'm curious to know if the city is looking at any plans to lower regulations that could increase costs for developers. I am thinking of costly examples that have hindered developers from capitalizing on zoning reforms, such as parking minimums, unrealistic size limitations of buildings, and developer fees. link

    Since infill seems to be a big portion of this plan, I'm curious to know if the city is looking at any plans to lower regulations that could increase costs for developers. I am thinking of costly examples that have hindered developers from capitalizing on zoning reforms, such as parking minimums, unrealistic size limitations of buildings, and developer fees.

    justafellow asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question! The South Core is an important residential neighbourhood in our city’s urban core and therefore infill development is an important consideration for this plan, especially facing the current growth and housing challenges. When looking at potential policies to regulate this development, whether through parking, building design, or overall form, we want to ensure that it is enabling the ‘right’ type of development in the ‘right’ places. Through our public engagement exercises and workshops, we hope to come to a general consensus on what is ‘right’ for the South Core and find a good balance in policies/regulations so new development is supported but appropriate for the area.

  • Share On the Mobility theme: is the idea of car sharing something you might recommend that the city support? on Facebook Share On the Mobility theme: is the idea of car sharing something you might recommend that the city support? on Twitter Share On the Mobility theme: is the idea of car sharing something you might recommend that the city support? on Linkedin Email On the Mobility theme: is the idea of car sharing something you might recommend that the city support? link

    On the Mobility theme: is the idea of car sharing something you might recommend that the city support?

    CRD asked over 1 year ago

    Alternative modes of transportation are an important consideration for mobility in the South Core. The City is supportive of ways to reduce the need for car ownership, and car sharing can be one way of achieving this. However, it’s important to note that there are challenges associated with establishing a car share program that go beyond the scope of the South Core Plan. We will still keep this concept in mind as we develop the plan and explore recommendations for mobility improvements in the area. Additionally, your recommendation will be passed along to City traffic engineers. Thank you for your input!

  • Share Will a part of the secondary municipal plan address the preservation and reconstruction of the rail ROW from Una Junction to York Street Station? Personally, I believe it is important for the city's future but doesn't seem to be given the attention it merits, considering its low drawbacks and significant upsides, so I'd like to see it at least addressed, if not explicitly planned for. If it isn't currently, will there be opportunities for Frederictonians to suggests aspects of the plan, so I can suggest the above properly? Thank you! on Facebook Share Will a part of the secondary municipal plan address the preservation and reconstruction of the rail ROW from Una Junction to York Street Station? Personally, I believe it is important for the city's future but doesn't seem to be given the attention it merits, considering its low drawbacks and significant upsides, so I'd like to see it at least addressed, if not explicitly planned for. If it isn't currently, will there be opportunities for Frederictonians to suggests aspects of the plan, so I can suggest the above properly? Thank you! on Twitter Share Will a part of the secondary municipal plan address the preservation and reconstruction of the rail ROW from Una Junction to York Street Station? Personally, I believe it is important for the city's future but doesn't seem to be given the attention it merits, considering its low drawbacks and significant upsides, so I'd like to see it at least addressed, if not explicitly planned for. If it isn't currently, will there be opportunities for Frederictonians to suggests aspects of the plan, so I can suggest the above properly? Thank you! on Linkedin Email Will a part of the secondary municipal plan address the preservation and reconstruction of the rail ROW from Una Junction to York Street Station? Personally, I believe it is important for the city's future but doesn't seem to be given the attention it merits, considering its low drawbacks and significant upsides, so I'd like to see it at least addressed, if not explicitly planned for. If it isn't currently, will there be opportunities for Frederictonians to suggests aspects of the plan, so I can suggest the above properly? Thank you! link

    Will a part of the secondary municipal plan address the preservation and reconstruction of the rail ROW from Una Junction to York Street Station? Personally, I believe it is important for the city's future but doesn't seem to be given the attention it merits, considering its low drawbacks and significant upsides, so I'd like to see it at least addressed, if not explicitly planned for. If it isn't currently, will there be opportunities for Frederictonians to suggests aspects of the plan, so I can suggest the above properly? Thank you!

    Ian Murdoch asked over 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question! Active Transportation connections, like the Cross Town Trail, are an important consideration in the South Core Plan. As you may know, the section of the trail from Smythe Street to York Street has a proposed plan that will be developed in the near future and can be reviewed on the Engage Fredericton site. The portion of the trail between York and Regent on the old rail right-of-way is partially on private property and has been considered in recent planning applications to ensure trail development along with the development of the site (attached). Easements as well as the deposit of base material are being prepared for that area to further establish the connections prior to full build-out. City staff will continue to work to improve trail connectivity but welcome your thoughts on the matter. Our next public open house is going to be scheduled in the fall, however you can always southcore@planpart.ca to set up a time to discuss ideas one on one. 

Page last updated: 16 Jul 2025, 07:19 AM